From 9aa3e1cb4db61d32d182c6dbc67cb19fe9f5bb75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabrice Mouhartem Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 17:46:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fix(typst): typo --- content/software/typst.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/software/typst.md b/content/software/typst.md index e02ee26..cf1e785 100644 --- a/content/software/typst.md +++ b/content/software/typst.md @@ -149,9 +149,9 @@ Hopefully, the tooling will be better with time. For simple document typesetting, even with features such as bibliography, cross-referencing, and table of contents, Typst seems to be a good choice. However, for long-term support documents, such as documentation, I would wait to -see it more stable. Even while writing this blog post, the _lettre_ template I -made was done in Typst 0.11, and preparing it in a repository raises some -warnings about breaking changes from 0.12: +see it being more stable. Even while writing this blog post, the _lettre_ +template I made was done in Typst 0.11, and preparing it in a repository raises +some warnings about breaking changes from 0.12: > Added > [`par.spacing`](https://typst.app/docs/reference/model/par/#parameters-spacing