Corrections David
This commit is contained in:
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The advantages of the best $\ppt$ adversary against $\DDH$ in group $\GG$ and $\
|
||||
In \cref{ch:sigmasig}, the security of our group signature scheme relies on the $\SXDH$ assumption, which is a well-studied assumption.
|
||||
Moreover, this assumption is static, meaning that the size of the assumption is independent of the number of queries made py the adversary or any feature (e.g., the maximal number of users) of the system, and is non-interactive, in the sense that it does not involve any oracle.
|
||||
|
||||
This gives us stronger confidente in the security of schemes proven under this kind of assumptions.
|
||||
This gives us stronger confidence in the security of schemes proven under this kind of assumptions.
|
||||
For instance, Cheon gave an attack against the $q$-Strong Diffie-Hellmann problem for large values of $q$~\cite{Che06} (which usually represents the number of adversarial queries).
|
||||
|
||||
In \cref{ch:sigmasig}, we also rely on the following assumption, which generalizes the Discrete Logarithm problem to asymmetric groups.
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user