Reduction DDH => DLP
This commit is contained in:
parent
b7cbdeb662
commit
0d2d8d934f
@ -129,7 +129,11 @@ To illustrate this, let us consider the two following assumptions:
|
||||
|
||||
The \textit{\DDH assumption} is the intractability of the problem for any $\ppt$ algorithm.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
The discrete logarithm assumption is implied by the decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption for instance. Indeed, if we can solve the discrete logarithm problem, then it suffices to compute the discrete logarithm of $g_1$, let say $a$, and then check whether $g_2^a = g_3$. Thus it is preferable to work with the discrete logarithm problem if it is possible.
|
||||
|
||||
The discrete logarithm assumption is implied by the decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption for instance.
|
||||
Indeed, if one is able to solve the discrete logarithm problem, then it suffices to compute the discrete logarithm of $g_1$, let say $\alpha$, and then check whether $g_2^\alpha = g_3$.
|
||||
This is why it is preferable to work with the discrete logarithm assumption if it is possible.
|
||||
For instance, there is no security proofs for the El Gamal encryption scheme from DLP.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Random-Oracle Model, Standard Model and Half-Simulatability}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user